Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Abercrombie & Fitch image 'just plain racist'

Published: Thursday, February 19, 2004

Updated: Thursday, March 3, 2011 16:03

"Oooh, Abercrombie's having a blow-out sale," my friend said. "Let's go in."
"Uh, I don't know," I told her. "Black folk don't really shop here. I'll walk around the food court or something."
"C'mon, it'll only be a minute, promise," my friend said.
Feeling outnumbered and out of place, I tried to look as natural as possible. I shuffled my feet and poked at the clothing. A bubbly sales clerk chirped, "Uh huh, yeah, that tube top looks great with those low-rise jeans," as techno music pulsated in the background.
Every couple of minutes, though, she would look over my shoulder and when I'd catch her glance, she'd squeeze off an uneasy smile.
But I've long dealt with this reality of Shopping-While-Black: either you're ignored or followed.
The billboard of handsome white jocks and beautiful white women frolicking in fields reminded me of how different I am from them. They are tall, slender and fair-skinned or Asian; everyone from the customers to the cashiers.
When I walked out, I was reminded of the many reasons why I refuse to spend my money in a place like Abercrombie & Fitch: 1) I don't have the "A&F look." 2) The suburban lifestyle doesn't appeal to me.
The Abercrombie image is just plain racist.
We all know that beauty is largely defined in this culture as white. Even some of the most popular black actresses and pop stars, such as Halle Barry and Beyonce, have lighter skin and long silky tresses.
At a young age, we are taught that white is beautiful - from Cinderella to Barbie.
Abercrombie employs these live Barbies to reinforce the Eurocentric ideal of beauty - or as they call it, the "all-American look." I always thought "all-American" referred to the melting pot theory we're taught in school. But I guess Abercrombie had something else in mind.
This controversial image is at the very heart of a racial-discrimination suit filed against Abercrombie & Fitch by nine Hispanic and Asian employees who accuse the company of unfair employment practices. Perhaps surprisingly, there are no black plaintiffs in the suit. In a way, we've created color-coded fashion associating the urban look of flashy tennis shoes, puffy coats, baggy jeans and jerseys with blacks, and the suburban look of khaki pants, polo tops and Dr. Martens with whites.
And Abercrombie represents this image perfectly, further propagating stereotypes and hatred with its racist message. Does Abercrombie have an obligation to represent minorities on their billboards and in their stores and catalogs? That's for the courts to decide.
But honestly, I cringe at the thought of Abercrombie & Fitch expanding its marketing of self-hate and racism to even more people.
(c) 2003, The Seattle Times. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments

Anonymous
Wed Aug 24 2011 18:07
That old ... "discrimination" ... horse is dead. Yet some whiners still beat it. THEY are the real racists.
Anonymous
Wed Aug 24 2011 15:05
This is yet another attempt by somebody to gin up a problem that has long since had its day. As much as the author truly wishes it were so and longs for a time when she had a legitimate complain, she doesn't. Blacks of yesteryear would have been thrilled to have a worker smiling at them, even if it was an awkward smile. The white people of today couldn't care less about a person's skin color, but people such as the author of this article are doing their best to divide everybody by race.
What kind of stupid statement is, "You're either ignored or you're followed"? Apparently this woman wants the salespeople to greet her immediately, but don't hang around her, but don't wander too far or they're racist because she can't find them when she needs them, but if they stick around too much they're following her. She needs to grow up.
And, whether the author wants to admit it or not, white people have more variety in the way they look, thus the reason they are viewed as more attractive. White people have all kinds of naturally different hair colors, eye colors, etc. Black people all have the same natural hair color and eye color, and there is only so much Disney could have done with that when creating the princesses. You know the racism argument has lost all credibility when the last leg it has to stand on is that the pretty blacks (Beyonce and Halle Berry) are the not-so-black blacks.
As racism becomes a dying problem, some people just have to keep stirring the pot. Mary Andom is one of those people.
Anonymous
Wed Aug 24 2011 14:58
This is yet another attempt by somebody to gin up a problem that has long since had its day. As much as the author truly wishes it were so and longs for a time when she had a legitimate complaint, she doesn���t. Blacks of yesteryear would have been thrilled to have a worker smiling at them, even if it was an awkward smile. The white people of today couldn���t care less about a person���s skin color, but people such as the author of this article are doing their best to divide everybody by race.
What kind of stupid statement is, ���You���re either ignored or you���re followed���? Apparently this woman wants the salespeople to greet her immediately, but don���t hang around her, but don���t wander too far or they���re racist because she can���t find them when she needs them, but if they stick around too much they���re following her. This woman needs to grow up.
And, whether the author wants to admit it or not, white people have more variety in the way they look, thus the reason they are viewed as more attractive. White people have all kinds of naturally different hair colors, eye colors, etc. Black people all have the same natural hair color and eye color, and there is only so much Disney could have done with that when creating the princesses. You know the racism argument has lost all credibility when the last leg it has to stand on is that the pretty blacks (Beyonce and Halle Berry) are the not-so-black blacks.
As racism becomes a dying problem, some people just have to keep stirring the pot. Mary Andom is one of those people.
Anonymous
Wed Aug 24 2011 11:23
So by the author's train of thought, anyone who finds slender, white, fair haired people asthetically pleasing is a racist? Well, wouldn't that make anyone who doesn't find them asthetically pleasing a racist as well? A bigot is a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from their own or intolerant of people of different political views, ethnicity, race, class, religion, profession, sexuality or gender. A&F may have a different opinion of beauty than the author, but that doesn't make them a racist or bigot. Telling them they can't have an opinion different than yours is bigotry. And just perhaps, the sales clerk the author thought was eyeballing them for their color, was actually eyeballing them for their attitude and aura of negativity. And the author complained because the clerk was smiling at them uneasily. Maybe it was her way of trying to figure out how to approach someone so blatantly unhappy. The author stereotyped the clerk just by her place of employment yet accuses her of stereotyping just because she smiled. How rude! Sales people smiling at customers? What's next, asking customers if they need assistance? Oh the horror! Seems someone is just a wee bit hypocritical.
I don't shop at A&F for myself because I'm too frugal and I usually can't find anything for very short legged people. Maybe I should sue them for discrimination against vertically challenged, fiscally prudent people.






log out